4 ms·
> This is a restriction on competition produced not by market dominance, at least not directly, but rather contracts that OEMs could not afford to say ‘No’ to.
by gilbetron 8y ago
> This is a restriction on competition produced not by market dominance, at least not directly, but rather contracts that OEMs could not afford to say ‘No’ to.
I'm not seeing a significant difference here. They couldn't afford to say "no" because MS was so dominant.
- hopler 8y agoHe's trying to draw a meaningless boundary between competitors being unable to access the market, and competitors being blocked by collusion.