I made a comment just a couple of days ago comparing the scientific approach of climate change with the scientific approach to pay gap. When climate change scie

I made a comment just a couple of days ago comparing the scientific approach of climate change with the scientific approach to pay gap. When climate change scientists get unaccounted data in regard to greenhouse gases it get put on hold until it get accounted. With pay gap the opposite happens where the unaccounted data is used as proof for discrimination. The unaccounted data in climate change is no more proof of natural phenomenon than unaccounted data in wages is proof of discrimination, and yet scientists in those two fields reach the opposite conclusions. If we really cared about science they should follow the same standard and treat unaccounted data as just that, unaccounted.