> Aren’t such deals usually banned as anticompetitive? I wonder who would bring the suit if they're divvying up the world country by country. Who has jurisdict

> Aren’t such deals usually banned as anticompetitive? I wonder who would bring the suit if they're divvying up the world country by country. Who has jurisdiction? The EU? Giving this marginally more thought, maybe the agreement is simply on use of the shared brand name, and that's what the agreement covers? I note both are active in the US, but under different names. That might just be enough to keep regulators happy.