2 ms·
I think they could go with a copyleft license. Or they should just announce that they are no longer committed to open source.
by didibus 8y ago
I think they could go with a copyleft license. Or they should just announce that they are no longer committed to open source.
- weberc2 8y ago> Or they should just announce that they are no longer committed to open source. Why? Because < 100% of their code is open source? This seems infeasibly idealistic, and a false dichotomy. You can be a proprietary software company that is still very committed to open source. Anyway, if < 100% is the standard, surely Amazon is worse yet, no?