4 ms·
Just saw your other comment about Fedora. Thanks for Fedora and EPEL. I was just pointing out that EPEL would benefit from some recognition as a semi-official b
by bubblethink 8y ago
Just saw your other comment about Fedora. Thanks for Fedora and EPEL. I was just pointing out that EPEL would benefit from some recognition as a semi-official but ultimately unsupported repo from RH. Technically RH already has 'optional' channels which are already in that category, but EPEL should really be that. Some communication channel between RH and EPEL and QA so that stuff doesn't break on RHEL point releases and maybe some resources for security updates would go a long way in making RHEL more usable.
- Conan_Kudo 8y agoWe'd all love that. It's funny, because Red Hat does regularly source content from EPEL to pull into RHEL for various products, which is where these issues come from. I would love it if Red Hat were to give it proper recognition. I honestly don't know why they haven't yet...
- mattdm 8y agoAre you a RHEL customer? If so, telling your salespeople this would not hurt. Just sayin' :)