3 ms·
than a lack of reader charity I'm sorry if that came across as accusing. I meant to imply that the author would benefit from more charitable language, not that
by nkurz 8y ago
than a lack of reader charity
I'm sorry if that came across as accusing. I meant to imply that the author would benefit from more charitable language, not that the reader had failed to supply it. I now see that it could also be read the other way.
- tomlock 8y agoYeah sorry, my interpretation probably comes from philosophy where people are often told to take a "charitable" interpretation of the text they're reading. I think we agree.