> If the link yields another wiki page, keep clicking on the reference links util you find the relevant documents. Neither snark nor a Wiki labyrinth are a sp

> If the link yields another wiki page, keep clicking on the reference links util you find the relevant documents. Neither snark nor a Wiki labyrinth are a specific citation for what you said: "The largest share of the data they collect is about Americans." Nothing on that Wikipedia page supports that claim, and certainly not with a citation from the Snowden documents. You're just bullshitting, and you're bullshitting on a serious topic like national security. It's transparent you're doing so, because you're citing non-specific things like a general Wikipedia page on the topic, after alleging a very serious thing was supported by the Snowden documents. If you were serious, and being honest, you'd have cited a specific document. Or set of documents. Or an analysis which supported your position. But you're not. (Nor is that Wiki page: several things listed as mass surveillance are nothing of the sort, and just regular ol spy work against foreign targets.)