3 ms·
This article is poorly reported drivel that serves only to promote the prosecutor's narrative without asking any of the difficult questions involved in this cas
by shkkmo 8y ago
This article is poorly reported drivel that serves only to promote the prosecutor's narrative without asking any of the difficult questions involved in this case.
- geezerjay 8y agoYou are referring to which questions?
- shkkmo 8y agoQuestions about parallel reconstruction and warrants. Questions about how much responsibility platform providers bear for the content they facilitate and who gets to call themselves a platform provider. Questions about provenance and chain of custody of digital evidence and question about the admissibility of digital evidence when investigators make major forensic mistakes. Questions about unequal ability to call experts and prosecutorial tricks to suppress evidence and disadvantage the defense. Questions about jurisdiction overlap, competition between agencies and localities as they relate to political pressure in high profile investigations. There are so many interesting and highly relevant questions brought up by this case and this article pretty much ignores them.