> preliminary investigation said Lion Air plane wasn't airworthy before its flight and basically blamed Lion Air for poor safety processes Your own links say n

> preliminary investigation said Lion Air plane wasn't airworthy before its flight and basically blamed Lion Air for poor safety processes Your own links say no such thing, and directly contradict your claims e.g.: > One of the angle-of-attack sensors on the airplane's fuselage was replaced after the airplane's penultimate flight - from Bali to Jakarta - after the Lion Air plane experienced malfunctioning data readings. Investigators therefore said the plane had not been airworthy during its last two flights. How did you get from repaired to "wasn't airworthy?" Also the actual report doesn't "blame" Lion Air, it simply lists the facts. It is far too early to be assigning blame, and I'm sure there will be enough to go around (including the regulators themselves).