3 ms·
Absolutely. However, which group would you belong to later on: - the one that avoided flying MAXs and it turned out to be something else - the one that avoide
by StreamBright 8y ago
Absolutely. However, which group would you belong to later on:
- the one that avoided flying MAXs and it turned out to be something else
- the one that avoided flying MAXs and it turned out to be a problem with the MAX
- the one that did not avoid flying MAXs and it turned out to be something else
- the one that did not avoid flying MAXs and it turned out to be a problem with the MAX
I think it is much safer to be in the first two and potentially being labeled paranoid later on worst case.
- cjbprime 8y agoI'm not sure why you say "however" or think we disagree. Maybe you misread my "wouldn't feel like an overreaction" as "would feel like an overreaction"? I agree with grounding the fleet, especially if it's the case that an MCAS software update was already being prepared but not yet deployed.
- StreamBright 8y agoYeah exactly that. :)