3 ms·
You have to understand that it is art. Hence the user interface has these "affordances". You are probably not an artist so you therefore don't understand why th
by Theodores 8y ago
You have to understand that it is art. Hence the user interface has these "affordances". You are probably not an artist so you therefore don't understand why the main page has the images and text too small.
The slight UX concern though is the audio. Not sure whether I would want to open this page in an open plan office with the speakers on:
http://exactitudes.com/index.php?/series/detail/5 http://exactitudes.com/index.php?/series/detail/5
- theon144 8y agoNah, if anything I'd say I'm primarily an artist, in web/digital as well as interactive A/V works; and I didn't even mention anything about images and text being "too small", don't know where you got that from. In any project though, and in art especially, there should be a purpose to the decisions made (even if it's as vague as "it felt good"), but in this case I don't really see how the navigation features I mentioned help me appreciate the photos better, or how they work on their own. Clicking twice to get to a gallery doesn't help me see the project in a different light. Absence of a scroll wheel makes me focus more on hovering my mouse at the edges just long enough to not overshoot or undershoot, rather than the photos themselves. In the end it's just a web presentation of a photography project! There's not much room to change stuff constructively.