4 ms·
And yet even if you throw out half his citations, he would still have over 3x as many as the woman who was hired over him. He has 21,000 citations. https://ww
by leereeves 8y ago
And yet even if you throw out half his citations, he would still have over 3x as many as the woman who was hired over him.
He has 21,000 citations.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessandro_Strumia https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessandro_Strumia
The woman who was hired has 3000.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anna_Ceresole https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anna_Ceresole
- SiempreViernes 8y agoYes, the slide you refer to, where he publicly names and insults a member of the selection comitte that didn’t hire him is the slide that relly got him in trouble. You are, quite obviously, going to get in trouble by demonstrating such lack of professionalism. Any selection comitte that considers questions such as: ”will the candidate respect collegues if they happen to be female” will from his presentation know that the answer is absolutey not.
- leereeves 8y ago> the slide you refer to I didn't refer to any slides. Are you replying to the wrong person? > ”will the candidate respect collegues if they happen to be female” will from his presentation know that the answer is absolutey not. But now I will refer to slides, to counter that statement: Physics does not depend on nation, race, sex ⇒ open to good people from any background. Curie etc. welcomed after showing what they can do, got Nobels... He doesn't object to women in physics. He objects to lower standards and "positive discrimination" for women in physics.