3 ms·
I wouldn't host anything in Hurricane Electric @ Fremont for several reasons: Back in 2008 an HE based colo "McColo" were shut down because they were hosting a
by dotBen 16y ago
I wouldn't host anything in Hurricane Electric @ Fremont for several reasons:
Back in 2008 an HE based colo "McColo" were shut down because they were hosting a HUGE amount of botnet controllers, spamming operations, and similar shady operations. When they were shut off some security firms saw a 50% drop in spam going through their firewalls.
However it only happened after immense pressure on HE and other providers involved by Google, Washington Post and all sorts of other players.
HE would have been aware because large IP blocks were being blacklisted (I heard at one point all of HE Freemont's IPs were blocked by some of the more extreme SBL lists) but they turned a blind eye and/or claimed Ts & Cs were not being infringed.
More here http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10095730-83.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10095730-83.html
I found that highly irresponsible, both in terms of the detriment to their other colo customers who were sharing the BGP-level bandwidth but also from a wider 'being a good actor' perspective.
Given that they are also on a fault line and that good connectivity to Europe is more important to me than Asia, I would prefer to host on East Coast.
I'm actually in Linode's New Jersey and London Colos, and they are both excellent.
- updog 16y agoI'm not sure that is a bad thing, actually. Although I do not like spam and botnets, at least they are willing to stand up for their customers and require due process. Others will cave on bogus DMCA notices and assume that the customer is guilty. I would actually call pulling the plug without due process irresponsible. Also, I question your claim about it happening only after "immense pressure." Your own link praises them for their response, and some googling suggests similar wording in all coverage I can find.