3 ms·
The possibility would be there though, forcing anybody considering the evidence to consider the possibility that she was the culprit and, as the culprit, was ca
by darkpuma 8y ago
The possibility would be there though, forcing anybody considering the evidence to consider the possibility that she was the culprit and, as the culprit, was capable of fabricating evidence of her innocence.
- tptacek 8y agoThe standard of proof in cases like these isn't "beyond a reasonable doubt".
- darkpuma 8y agoI'm well aware, not sure why you think I'm not. If she were guilty of hiring somebody to do the hacking but not actually doing it herself, then she might not know when the sensitive times were and would therefore be unable to fabricate evidence covering the sensitive times. That's what you pointed out, however it's not particularly relevant. The possibility that she was the technically competent hacker who was capable of fabricating EXIF data is a strong enough possibility for the university to meet their low standard of proof, and consequently determine she's guilty.