> The guy is a physicist, he is way more qualified than any sociologist to deal with statistics. As an experimental LHC physicist myself, his use of statistics

> The guy is a physicist, he is way more qualified than any sociologist to deal with statistics. As an experimental LHC physicist myself, his use of statistics is either naive (understandable, he’s a theorist) or negligent. He used his mathematical background to appear knowledgeable despite there being huge flaws in his “evidence”.