3 ms·
With regards to testing, I think I have very thoroughly tested, at least enough for my own knowledge. For example, when I do what I know I should be doing, bas
by lcall 8y ago
With regards to testing, I think I have very thoroughly tested, at least enough for my own knowledge. For example, when I do what I know I should be doing, based on my belief in God or based on the limited things I have felt are right, in spite of my weakness, things go better and I am always glad. No exceptions that I know of, and I have been tracking this. On the other hand, when I have gone against that, due to wanting to do things my own stubborn way instead, of course I may, and sometimes do so for a long time, but there are always regrets. Tracked much of that also, and the results are clear to me. I don't know if that counts as falsifiable for you (probably not, because the specific experience was mine, not yours), but I can say with confidence, having heard much of experiences of others also, that you can learn the same if you wish. But no one can give it to without your at least minimal initial desire and some effort, and willingness to follow what you learn for yourself to be true, step by step. That is how it works. You will know when you know, and then you will know more when you apply it patiently and see that it works.
One person pointed out there are more ways to determine truth than science alone (essential and valuable as it is):
Again, there is more info at my previously-linked web site.
I'm not sure whether that can be a helpful answer for you, but has certainly been convincing to me, both the easy way and the hard way.