3 ms·
"Over to IFuckedUrMom666, retired former Windows 95 installation champion, for some extra commentary." "Thanks Jeff. Yeah, we'll have to see how this plays out
by tom_ 8y ago
"Over to IFuckedUrMom666, retired former Windows 95 installation champion, for some extra commentary."
"Thanks Jeff. Yeah, we'll have to see how this plays out, but I'm tentatively calling this one as maybe not a mistake. By leaving IPX support in, there's an extra 198 sectors to copy - but you save 39ms later from reduced install logging, as there's never any IPX check failures from the network infrastructure. He's been playing such a straight-up game here so far, so this is actually quite interesting - we might be seeing hints here of the bolder, gutsier play that he's going to have to bring to the table far more often to later stages. The Plus! installation round in particular is not for the faint-hearted."
"IFuckedUrMom666 - thanks. We'll be back for more analysis later."
- barclay 8y agoIf there was ever a need for hackernews silver... This was genius. Well done. _Golf clap_