> Since he proved he can do physics at high level enough to be part of CERN, One, no, he didn't, he made errors of basic science in his argument and that shoul

> Since he proved he can do physics at high level enough to be part of CERN, One, no, he didn't, he made errors of basic science in his argument and that should make his entire physics work suspect. Two, "he can do physics at high level" is the opposite of everything CERN and the scientific method itself stands for. The scientific method does not say, if you're a genius, you can make discoveries. The scientific method says, if you work consistently and steadily and reproducibility in a community of peers, you can discover things about the world by using data from the world. Science is not about hiring mages who have a high enough mana level. CERN is a collaboration and a laboratory, which implies working together. If you're operating on a high level at your own, you have no need for CERN. If you're operating at a high level when you happen to have other colleagues around, then being able to work with those colleagues is a skill you must have as a scientist.