3 ms·
It's a good point, but I do suspect that if I were to look into it the kinds of people you mention: "nurses, doctors, teachers, engineers, programmers" who are
by RugnirViking 8y ago
It's a good point, but I do suspect that if I were to look into it the kinds of people you mention:
"nurses, doctors, teachers, engineers, programmers"
who are on twitter would actually turn out to have their own blogs or have written a book read by an audience, and would be thought leaders in their field and such folk. Your average member of those classes are likely not regular users of twitter.
Twitter just doesn't work if people don't care what you say - you have to already be a celebrity, with an opinion that 'matters' to people.
" Twitter doesn't do a good job of surfacing different communities"
Yes, but what I am getting at here is that they are communities in the sense of several important people in the field who all know each other
and thats it.
There simply aren't many 'average' people using twitter regularly, at least in the sense of writing thoughts and/or having conversations.
"using Twitter is sometimes a useful way to get customer support. "
Yes, thats what I was saying. I think it should not be this way - at least, the actual dedicated customer support of the company should be at least as effective as tweeting at them.
- DanBC 8y agoI mentioned nurses because I know there are many UK nurses who use Twitter. The discussions are under hashtags like #wenurse and #wenurses I agree that discovery is hard for Twitter, but these communities are there. I use Twitter to talk to people.involved in suicide prevention, safety of MH services, and quality improvement of MH services. It's given me easy access to a bunch of people. I'd prefer a different platform because Twitter has problems with hostility on top of user unfriendliness, but people are there.