4 ms·
I think there is no way we can know what is necessary for intelligence. Life is not necessary for intelligence. As a counter-example, intelligent robots are ce
by millstone 8y ago
I think there is no way we can know what is necessary for intelligence.
Life is not necessary for intelligence. As a counter-example, intelligent robots are certainly possible. What other substrates might support intelligence?
Life does not require proper axial tilt or distance from supernovas. There is life on the bottom of the ocean that survive on the heat and chemicals from hydrothermal vents, a metabolic pathway that does not depend on the sun. What other possibilities are there that don't happen to be present on earth?
We are biased towards human size, time scales, and biochemistry. And time and again, we have been surprised by forms of life that work differently.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- TomMarius 8y agoOptical computing fascinates me. Imagine an intelligence based on that.
- ethbro 8y agoThere was an argument somewhere that biological computational substrate density (with respect to round trip signal speed) was critical. If you've only had time for 3 thoughts (to simplify) since evolving intelligence... a civilization of your beings probably isn't doing too well.