4 ms·
Is there any tech company where the technical track doesn't plateau below the people-manager track?
by sidlls 8y ago
Is there any tech company where the technical track doesn't plateau below the people-manager track?
- lbotos 8y agoGitLab (I work there) does allow you to become Staff-Level which is the same multiplier as a manager.
- sidlls 8y agoYes, that's common: but I have yet to see a case where the tech track goes as high as the management track. For example, "Distinguished/Staff Engineer" might be the equivalent of a "Senior Director" in an org with two or three levels of management above that (VP, SVP/CTO, EVP, etc.).
- Shebanator 8y agoGoogle's tech track does go all the way to VP equivalents.
- robterrell 8y agoMany companies have separate tracks for independent contributors and managers. You can stay an IC and level up to Distinguished Engineer or Fellow or Staff Engineer or whatever, without needing to go into management.
- pdimitar 8y agoI think we might need a curated list for those. At 17 years of career I've only seen one such company.
- robterrell 8y agoIt seems pretty common with bigger companies: Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Oracle, Box, Zynga, Electronic Arts, Pinterest, Microsoft, etc. The tracks and levels are commonly referred to as the "job family architecture" -- don't be afraid to ask a recruiter for this information. Otherwise you'll never really know if you're being properly leveled. (For instance, I believe a Principal SE at Microsoft is roughly equal to a Staff Engineer at Google.)
- bradleyjg 8y agoThe issue isn't the absolute height. The top manager (CEO) is going to make more more than the top IC, that's just obvious. The real issue is that management is a pyramid but IC is ziggurat with, if you're lucky, an obelisk sitting on top of it. People like to point to the principal staff engineer or whatever, but there's one of them for every twenty upper-mid level managers making the same money. And all those managers can take their skills to another company, but if an IC guru leaves the company where he made his bones he's probably destined for consulting (at best). Consulting has its upsides, but that's no more for everyone than management.
- sidlls 8y agoI think both are true. There are more "slots" for management than technical leaders at the same compensation band. There are also generally at least some compensation bands in management that are above the highest band tech lead role (architect, chief/principal/distinguished/staff/whatever).
- maxxxxx 8y agoIn my company it’s also much slower to move up the technical track compared to the manager track. If you want to make money it’s much better to be manager.
- SZJX 8y agoI guess that would just not be realistic. There was a comment from a while ago that I think makes total sense: The organization has to evaluate the value that you bring and create. If your position moves and directs dozens of people, it will be hard for an individual contributor to match the importance no matter what. Of course, it's fine if you prefer to remain a more individual, engineering-oriented position. But there is little reason to expect you'd reach the same level of importance to the organization as some top managers/executives.
- sidlls 8y agoAgreed, completely. Most ICs overestimate their importance by far. Most people do regardless of title.