4 ms·
But the human brain fails at this if it's rotated also... If you showed me the rabbit rotation of the picture, i'd tell you with pretty high confidence that it
by Klathmon 8y ago
But the human brain fails at this if it's rotated also...
If you showed me the rabbit rotation of the picture, i'd tell you with pretty high confidence that it's a rabbit.
If you showed me the duck rotation, i'd tell you with pretty high confidence that it's a duck.
That's the point of this, it's an illusion.
And it did give a bit of an "I don't know" answer for many of the rotations in the middle of the gif/video, which is exactly as I would expect it to, and when I pause the video at those points and glance at it, it doesn't look like much of anything to me either.
- 2muchcoffeeman 8y agoBut a human brain should only falls for it once. You have your initial reaction, realise it might be the other animal and then from there you know it’s an illusion and the rotation of the picture no longer matters.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- angry_octet 8y agoIf they chose to allow a classification option of (c) optical illusion, then the system could easily learn that. In fact, you could probably make a GAN ambiguous image generator.
- 2muchcoffeeman 8y agoAn ambiguous image is not always ambiguous. Eg clever animal camouflage. A caterpillar that looks like a snake should not be classified as ambiguous. It should always be caterpillar.
- angry_octet 8y agoAh, but then you open the door to more complex and meaningful classification. For example "insect camouflaged as a stick" or the classic "couch with leopard print pattern".
- joesb 8y agoWhat's the correct answer for this? Is it definitely a rabbit regardless of the orientation. Or is it definitely a duck regardless of the orientiation? I still fail to see how human brain only fall for this illusion once.