4 ms·
I don't understand. The SIA68 theory doesn't address the debris matching MH370 that washed up in the Indian ocean. Several of the debris are almost certainly fr
by tristanj 8y ago
I don't understand. The SIA68 theory doesn't address the debris matching MH370 that washed up in the Indian ocean. Several of the debris are almost certainly from MH370. The debris had barnacles implying they spent at least a year in the sea.
- mark-r 8y agoIs the article incorrect then when it says the marine life found on the debris was inconsistent with the amount of time the plane has been gone?
- DuskStar 8y agoFrom the article: > By now, some 30 pieces have been found. Investigators assumed that after more than a year these would be covered in rich colonies of marine organisms, whose makeup would shed light on the path the pieces had taken through the ocean. To their surprise, they found none of them hosted organisms more than a couple of months old. That gives some plausibility to "people moved debris to the ocean later", though also to "marine growth is weird sometimes". It doesn't support the statement "we have evidence confirming that MH370 crashed into the ocean at approximately the time it disappeared".
- Aloha 8y agoAlso, I'm reasonably certain the aluminum is coated with what amount to an anti-fouling coating, to prevent the growth of organisms on the surface.