> To what end? "illegally undermine competition?" It doesn't have to be illegal to undermine competition. Luxottica owns a vertical of 80% of the brands, the f

> To what end? "illegally undermine competition?" It doesn't have to be illegal to undermine competition. Luxottica owns a vertical of 80% of the brands, the factories, the retail stores, AND the largest insurance company concerning eyeglasses in America. It isn't illegal, but the rents they are extracting from our society by keeping prices artificially high sure as hell SHOULD be.