5 ms·
Why not both? Dumping on someone’s policy because you don’t who they target first doesn’t really help. God knows I’d trust her to break up ISPs before pretty m
by marricks 8y ago
Why not both? Dumping on someone’s policy because you don’t who they target first doesn’t really help.
God knows I’d trust her to break up ISPs before pretty much any other candidate.
- astine 8y agoThat's a fair point, but I think that there is also a valid concern about distraction. Does focus on FAANG companies result in less attention given to the potentially more dangerous ISPs? Could the ISPs use concern about Amazon, etc as an argument that they are actually less dangerous and should be ignored?
- psadauskas 8y agoI'm not "dumping" on her policy, I'm dumping on her choice of targets. I'm not happy about the App Store monopoly, but I'm actually upset at Comcast's behavior in every area they do business.
- sigmar 8y ago"Elizabeth Warren Slams Comcast, Wants More Antitrust Enforcement" https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Elizabeth-Warren-Slams-Comcast-Wants-More-Antitrust-Enforcement-137333 https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Elizabeth-Warren-Slams-C... 2016, but still..
- bertil 8y agoHas she done anything since?
- pseudalopex 8y agoWhat actions do you expect from one legislator in a house where the controlling party has been deregulating ISPs?
- bertil 8y agoSuggest bi-partisan regulations sounds like a bare minimum. Gather information from specialists. Suggesting to split companies requires a minimum effort: understand what interactions exist now between the teams. I don’t have the impression that she’s done that.
- rasz 8y agogood evidence its just politician talking and nothing will come out of it