3 ms·
I don't get how this is racial discrimination or even how they get to this conclusion. Example: We have 3 groups: Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 There are 2 types of
by rootshelled 8y ago
I don't get how this is racial discrimination or even how they get to this conclusion.
Example:
We have 3 groups:
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
There are 2 types of services:
Service A
Service B
3% of group 1 can't use Service A
14% of group 2 can't use Service A
13% of group 3 can't use Service A
Does Service A racially discriminate against any of these group?
No, it does not. It just can't accepts business from people who use Service A. So people who can't or won't use Service A have to go to another business that does accept Service B.
But okay let's play pretend.
Let's say it is discrimination then it's only potentally more effective against certain groups by 10%.
I say potentially because how many in this group would go to a this specific chain? probably less then that 10%.
I'd wager the actual percentage affected falls in the area of margin of error. AKA sucks to be you but it's a free country so cross the street to somewhere they do accept your cash.
- hacym 8y agoI agree that -- all things being equal -- the market could probably sort these things out. But, the point is that things aren't equal. I could definitely see a situation where a company uses a cash ban as a facade to reject a certain clientele (namely, poor people that can't afford the technology or don't have the means to get a credit card).