> I think it should be giving a 50/50 classification of duck and rabbit at all rotations if it was working as expected. This would likely give incorrect or wor

> I think it should be giving a 50/50 classification of duck and rabbit at all rotations if it was working as expected. This would likely give incorrect or worse results when, eg, classifying ducks and rabbits in wildlife photos — animals come in orientations, and you’ll do a better job classifying them in practice if you respect that. It’s also not the case that a human would classify it 50/50 in all rotations — it certainly looks more or less like one or the other as you rotate it. Humans are even program,Ed for that compromise: we see faces in one orientation much better than rotated 180 degrees.