4 ms·
Arguing over the morality (or even constitutionality) of such a measure was not the point of me bringing it up. So what? I was asking how you would feel. The
by stcredzero 8y ago
Arguing over the morality (or even constitutionality) of such a measure was not the point of me bringing it up.
So what? I was asking how you would feel.
The point was that there are compelling arguments to make that both greatly liberalizing school choice and greatly eliminating school choice would improve things for those who are economically disadvantaged.
Eliminating choice is generally about centralizing control.
- aidenn0 8y ago>> Arguing over the morality (or even constitutionality) of such a measure was not the point of me bringing it up. > So what? I was asking how you would feel. To me how I feel about it is tied directly to the morality of it. >> The point was that there are compelling arguments to make that both greatly liberalizing school choice and greatly eliminating school choice would improve things for those who are economically disadvantaged. > Eliminating choice is generally about centralizing control. I disagree with this. Eliminating choice generally causes a centralizing of control, but that does not mean it's generally the motivation for it.