4 ms·
Yeah, I'm often one to criticise Google, but an entirely free cloud-based photo album was never going to be around forever. If you are very concerned with keepi
by untog 8y ago
Yeah, I'm often one to criticise Google, but an entirely free cloud-based photo album was never going to be around forever. If you are very concerned with keeping an online record for all time you really shouldn't be depending on free stuff like Picasa.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Eric_WVGG 8y agoMaybe, but it would also cost Google almost nothing to set up a 301 redirect from Picasa URLs to Google Photos. I wouldn't expect someone like Yahoo or Microsoft to bother, but being a “good web citizen” seems intrinsic to the Google corporate identity, after all.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- nikanj 8y agoThe harder it is to find things via following links, the more you’ll resort to search. Google has a perverse incentive to break the links.
- ucaetano 8y agoBut that doesn't solve the issue that the photos on Google Photos are private by default, so Google would need to change the sharing to public on all photos that have external links, which would be a terrible privacy measure.
- mhdhn 8y agoHello Gmail users! :)
- ucaetano 8y agoYou really shouldn't count on having Gmail available forever! Or even for a few years.
- Rebelgecko 8y agoIf you use Inbox, you can't count on it being available for more than few weeks :(
- ArrayList 8y ago> an entirely free cloud-based photo album Uhh.. isn't that exactly what Google Photos is?