4 ms·
You're framing this as if there can only ever be one initiative, and that saving water while brushing teeth was the wrong choice. Realistically there could be
by simongr3dal 8y ago
You're framing this as if there can only ever be one initiative, and that saving water while brushing teeth was the wrong choice.
Realistically there could be a new initiative like that 1-5 times a decade. Society rarely behaves in the most optimal way, and as I said saving water is very low effort, though it might also be low impact. The real faillure not following up with more and better initiatives.
What if none of the available waste disposal companies are using newer trucks, are you supposed to call them every week like with congress people?
And how is buying a bag of peanuts branded with some promise of ecological responsibility any different from saving water brushing their teeth? A single bag of peanuts from a different brand doesn't make any impact by it self and it only serves to make people feel like they've done their part adequately.
- LeifCarrotson 8y agoNot at all; just that of the possible initiatives one of the least effective options was chosen. By analogy, if you were trying to help someone get out of debt, would you advocate they take unpaid time off work to walk along the roadside collecting cans for the deposit, or work overtime hours at $50/hr? There's limited energy and funds available for these initiatives; by advocating ineffective ones more harm than good is done.