3 ms·
I don't think so. Pulling a journalist in once to ask for information would fit with that. But flagging them so that all future border crossings result in auto
by CWuestefeld 8y ago
I don't think so. Pulling a journalist in once to ask for information would fit with that.
But flagging them so that all future border crossings result in automatic detainment for questioning can't be seen that way. I can only read that as surveillance and harassment.
- azeotropic 8y agoLook at it from the perspective of an investigator who believes that there are Americans providing financial assistance to a caravan that turned violent, as well as the ordinary customs enforcement duty to ensure that large amounts of cash do not cross the border. If you don't know which Americans were involved, but suspect several who were present at a particular event, it may make perfect sense to question them every time you see them at the border, and search them (at the very least) for money. The fact that a lot of the intrusive questions that the reporter complained about were financial in nature (e.g. "Do you own or rent your home?" or "Who pays for your travel?") seem entirely consistent with this mission. I agree that it is surveillance, but you seem to forget that that's one of the things law enforcement does in an investigation.