4 ms·
Others have hinted at this, but when I read this story, I had a big "HUH?" moment. I just returned into the USA last week at SFO, and I can assure you that I d
by URSpider94 16y ago
Others have hinted at this, but when I read this story, I had a big "HUH?" moment. I just returned into the USA last week at SFO, and I can assure you that I didn't go through any kind of security screening upon re-entering the USA.
The USA, unlike many other countries, requires that you clear out through Customs at your first point of entry. This is an operational issue, because after that, you are mixed with domestic passengers. Clearing through Customs requires that you pick up your checked luggage. As such, you are no longer "sterile" from an airport security perspective (you could have pulled a box cutter out of your checked luggage, for example). This means that, if you plan to continue on as a domestic passenger, then you have to be re-screened for security, just like someone walking in from the street.
What boggles my mind is that the folks who set up this airport require non-passengers to go through TSA security, just to walk out of the terminal. Not only is this a waste of time and money, but it also introduces people with no legitimate reason to travel into the terminal. Put another way, if I WANTED to pass through a TSA checkpoint at most airports without a ticket for onward travel, I would be turned away.
In summary, I guess I can understand why this guy thought that he was being screened to re-enter the country, when in fact he was just the victim of very, very poor airport design.
- dalke 16y agoAtlanta airport, for example, is one of several US airports which weren't designed with the current security policies in mind. International arrivals occur at the furthest terminal from the exit, and in order for passengers to get to the exit they must take the shuttle car system or walk, and both are inside the "sterile" area of the airport. I sent a letter to the TSA last week asking about the legality of this search. Can a passenger just after existing customs and immigration decline further screening, and if so, how? If not, when is it presumed that the passenger gave consent to the search and what level of search was consented to? I'm curious as to what their answer will be.