4 ms·
>That doesn’t mean I think she has made any of this up. She has an awfully weird way of expressing this. The first few paragraphs of her post are dedicated to
by burgerbrain 16y ago
>That doesn’t mean I think she has made any of this up.
She has an awfully weird way of expressing this. The first few paragraphs of her post are dedicated to implying as hard as she can that this blog post is some sort of meat industry propaganda.
For example:
>There is so much that is eerily parallel in these stories—not just the vague descriptions of the health-related experiences but also the evolving philosophy regarding food justice, and some very, very similar language.
- autarch 16y agoI think Ginny's saying that the the author of the blog post is simply echoing things she read elsewhere. That doesn't mean it's some sort of propaganda effort on the part of the blog poster.
- burgerbrain 16y agoI think that's definitely how she's trying to spin it "officially", but her actual intent is pretty clear. >I have to admit I’m always a little suspicious when an ex-vegan dives headlong into a love affair with meat. I mean come on, what else is that supposed to mean? Is she "suspicious" that the author is simply echoing a new-found respect for meat? That doesn't even make sense.
- autarch 16y agoSheesh, you really love your conspiracy theories. Ginny's post is primarily about debunking the ridiculous health claims in the original post. She's "suspicious" of the claims because they're ridiculous, and the amount of fervor that Tasha shows suggests that there's something going on besides nutrition.
- burgerbrain 16y agoIt's a conspiracy theory to suggest that others are seeing conspiracies where there are none? Man you people are nuts.
- autarch 16y agoYou're saying that Ginny is suggesting a conspiracy, when she isn't. That's all I'm saying.