3 ms·
And there are many people who will wrongly think the China Study is something to pay attention to: http://www.google.com/#q=debunking+china+study http://www.goo
by alone 16y ago
And there are many people who will wrongly think the China Study is something to pay attention to: http://www.google.com/#q=debunking+china+study http://www.google.com/#q=debunking+china+study
- anthonyb 16y ago"debunking" is a rather loaded term, don't you think? I would imagine that you're more likely to pull up crank sites than normal with a search like that. In any case, there are (claimed) responses from the author of the China study which might be worth reading: http://www.30bananasaday.com/group/debunkingthechinastudycritics/forum/topics/campbells-response-to-denises http://www.30bananasaday.com/group/debunkingthechinastudycri... http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/campbell_china_response.htm http://www.vegsource.com/articles2/campbell_china_response.h... I haven't been able to find these on any "official" site though, so beware ;)
- dejb 16y agoIf a link to google search is what you think passes as debate then why not also check out http://www.google.com/#q=debunking+evolution http://www.google.com/#q=debunking+evolution The standard of debate is likely to be at a similar level. If you actually have an confidence in any of these 'debunkings' then why not point out one that you think will stand up to scrutiny?