4 ms·

Intelligence officers not aristocrats although I do believe the current reality does reflect the characterization you have presented . There’s definitely a com

Intelligence officers not aristocrats although I do believe the current reality does reflect the characterization you have presented . There’s definitely a complex system of people with money power intelligence at war The math problem is why it’s imperative to indoctrinate our best and brightest to fight for the greater good, and in regard to the power vacuum surrounding that unavoidable math reality I also support our government going after people making secure communication devices intended to circumvent government controls, too much at stake Sure you cannot stop evil person with textbook and initiative but you can do the best you can related: Lack of Forfeiture mechanism is one instance of a deficiency with mainstream cryptocurrencies

craftinator 8y ago
I've worked with a few Intel officers, military and non, and I find it hard not to label their actions and attitudes as 'aristocratic'. Your "best and brightest" paragraph makes no sense to me, but strongly reminds me of the BS spewing out of the mouth of James Comey while he tried to convince the members of Congress that you can have a crypto system that is both secure against hackers, but has a backdoor for government surveillance, which is a mathematical impossibility. Pretty sure he said "best and brightest" as well, as if silicon valley can magic away mathematical reality. I also think that for nearly the entire history of mankind, barring the last few decades, governments have been unable to observe a vast majority of communication of their populace. Not sure what you mean by "too much at stake"... I've never heard of a major, nonmilitary attack that could have been prevented if only we'd had a backdoor into the communications; however I have heard of many, many crimes occuring because we THOUGHT we had secure crypto.
- evolvedcleaning 8y ago
  It’s conceivable to make a skeleton key system that doesn’t change the surface area of attack that much. Such a system can respect the right to privacy, while allowing for a way to police child predators. Too bad you met some snooty NSA employees. You could report them if you think they aren’t trustworthy to do sigint.
  - onlydeadheroes 8y ago
    > mathematical impossibility
    - evolvedcleaning 8y ago
      I didn’t make that claim. Obviously there’s a small trade off that is practically irrelevant, you can optimize so that the trade off doesn’t make it practically much less secure, make up for it elsewhere
      - onlydeadheroes 8y ago
        No you didn't, but the person you replied to did, and you managed to overlook it then and now. Please go and design your algorithm where you "make up for it elsewhere". I don't know why you are posting about this if you don't know anything about the matter.
        evolvedcleaning 8y ago
        This comment now has a reply button. Another comment about “good old fashioned troll” was made close by, but there isn’t a reply button: No, you’re right. I’m not an expert and maybe I’m wrong. Just seems possible to build a better mouse trap here. I couldn’t build it, you’re right. Wish I had such skills. But I’ve looked into the topic and bit and noodled with crypto as a user and in principle it should be possible to build a skeleton key crypto system that isn’t much less secure. Just seems that way to me. Non expert guess. I’m sure such tech could be evolved to solve the spof key issue (wouldn’t want your skeleton key leaking) for instance
        evolvedcleaning 8y ago
        http://globalpolicy.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IEEE18006.pdf http://globalpolicy.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IEEE... My response was in consideration of the points here. Snowden, one of his goals, besides defecting to Russia, was to “start the conversation”. The rumor is that have been involved with shadow brokers btw If your boss came to you and said, by law, we need to build crypto with an evolved key escrow system that overcomes the security problems noted by IEEE and others, could you do it? Would you do it? Easy to say “no way, it can’t be done” with or without some type of bias towards a desire for perfectly strong encryption, but again I suspect that it is possible to build such a thing, if it doesn’t exist already. Do you think such a thing is possible? Also may I ask your view on Ed Snowden’s actions?

craftinator 8y ago

I've worked with a few Intel officers, military and non, and I find it hard not to label their actions and attitudes as 'aristocratic'. Your "best and brightest" paragraph makes no sense to me, but strongly reminds me of the BS spewing out of the mouth of James Comey while he tried to convince the members of Congress that you can have a crypto system that is both secure against hackers, but has a backdoor for government surveillance, which is a mathematical impossibility. Pretty sure he said "best and brightest" as well, as if silicon valley can magic away mathematical reality. I also think that for nearly the entire history of mankind, barring the last few decades, governments have been unable to observe a vast majority of communication of their populace. Not sure what you mean by "too much at stake"... I've never heard of a major, nonmilitary attack that could have been prevented if only we'd had a backdoor into the communications; however I have heard of many, many crimes occuring because we THOUGHT we had secure crypto.

evolvedcleaning 8y ago
It’s conceivable to make a skeleton key system that doesn’t change the surface area of attack that much. Such a system can respect the right to privacy, while allowing for a way to police child predators. Too bad you met some snooty NSA employees. You could report them if you think they aren’t trustworthy to do sigint.
- onlydeadheroes 8y ago
  > mathematical impossibility
  - evolvedcleaning 8y ago
    I didn’t make that claim. Obviously there’s a small trade off that is practically irrelevant, you can optimize so that the trade off doesn’t make it practically much less secure, make up for it elsewhere
    - onlydeadheroes 8y ago
      No you didn't, but the person you replied to did, and you managed to overlook it then and now. Please go and design your algorithm where you "make up for it elsewhere". I don't know why you are posting about this if you don't know anything about the matter.
      - evolvedcleaning 8y ago
        This comment now has a reply button. Another comment about “good old fashioned troll” was made close by, but there isn’t a reply button: No, you’re right. I’m not an expert and maybe I’m wrong. Just seems possible to build a better mouse trap here. I couldn’t build it, you’re right. Wish I had such skills. But I’ve looked into the topic and bit and noodled with crypto as a user and in principle it should be possible to build a skeleton key crypto system that isn’t much less secure. Just seems that way to me. Non expert guess. I’m sure such tech could be evolved to solve the spof key issue (wouldn’t want your skeleton key leaking) for instance
        evolvedcleaning 8y ago
        http://globalpolicy.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IEEE18006.pdf http://globalpolicy.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IEEE... My response was in consideration of the points here. Snowden, one of his goals, besides defecting to Russia, was to “start the conversation”. The rumor is that have been involved with shadow brokers btw If your boss came to you and said, by law, we need to build crypto with an evolved key escrow system that overcomes the security problems noted by IEEE and others, could you do it? Would you do it? Easy to say “no way, it can’t be done” with or without some type of bias towards a desire for perfectly strong encryption, but again I suspect that it is possible to build such a thing, if it doesn’t exist already. Do you think such a thing is possible? Also may I ask your view on Ed Snowden’s actions?