4 ms·
That's funny, but it also sounds like a cynical way of looking at your work. Once you throw in games in the "waste of time" bucket, where do you stop? Movies? M
by martythemaniak 8y ago
That's funny, but it also sounds like a cynical way of looking at your work. Once you throw in games in the "waste of time" bucket, where do you stop? Movies? Music? Drawing? etc?
20ms sounds like very little, but have you ever tried to get anything done in a place where everybody has a lax attitude towards time?
- ahartmetz 8y agoYou kinda said it - lowering latency is less about saving time, it's more about saving annoyance / making the product more pleasant to use. I might be particularly sensitive to it - I have a strong preference for low latency and tight controls in everything including cars. Ten or fifteen seconds bootup, don't care too much. I click on a browser tab and it takes 200ms to switch - ugh, is there a better browser?
- forgotmypw2 8y agoThat's 20ms on a good link, but on a bad one there's probably a multiplier. Too bad all these savings are eclipsed by js cruft.