5 ms·

And making blockchain to SQL Server migration consultants wealthy too.

• jessaustin 8y ago
  We would have believed postgres, but that's just far-fetched.
  • maxander 8y ago
    Blockchain to CSV, realistically.
  • quickthrower2 8y ago
    This is an enterprise solution. Oracle is even better.
    • pratnala 8y ago
      cosmos db is where it is at
      • taude 8y ago
        I can't believe y'all aren't taking advantage of using MongoDB's data loss feature as an opportunity here in true HN taste.
        • ljm 8y ago
          Chekhov’s Database: if a No-SQL DB is referred to in passing, it is inevitable that it will fail to persist at the most inconvenient time.
• godzillabrennus 8y ago
  Not enough working blockchain implementations for this to exist. I wonder what all the white paper consultants are doing now that their profession is over? Probably working on a cannabis company.
• deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
• magnamerc 8y ago
  Ah yes, because blockchain data structures are completely useless...
  • quickthrower2 8y ago
    Extravagant is the word I’d use. You can store crypto sigs in a varchar(max)
• bitxbitxbitcoin 8y ago
  Wouldn’t it be SQL Server to blockchain migration consultants that are getting the wealth as opposed to the other way around?