> [I]n 2000+, hearing (and vision) is completely understood scientifically and far surpassed by measuring apparatus at every frequency range Yes, we have instr

> [I]n 2000+, hearing (and vision) is completely understood scientifically and far surpassed by measuring apparatus at every frequency range Yes, we have instrumentation better than the meat-based transducers in the human body. That doesn't mean we completely understand said meat-based transducers or how that meat-computer in our skull interprets signals from those transducers. The auditory and visual systems are still subjects of active research with many outstanding problems. I mean, I'll be among the first to call bullshit on audiophile snake-oil like people pushing 192 kHz/24 bit music, but in your rush to discredit such things, you've gone too far in the other direction.