> This isn't an efficient use of resources, especially when you scale it to millions of people. I'd have to think about this more to decide whether or not it's

> This isn't an efficient use of resources, especially when you scale it to millions of people. I'd have to think about this more to decide whether or not it's true, my life is more sustainable than it ever has been before. In pure watt hour accounting, I wager I'm energy-cheaper than most city people who deeply care about things like that. You're mistaken about wells requiring filtration. > If anything in your janky setup breaks and you can't fix it in a few days, you will find yourself at a motel and fully back "on the grid". This, like much of your reply, is rather presumptuous and ungenerous. There are some good discussion points in your reply. Unfortunately you've also stated as incontrovertible fact several things that are simply incorrect. I don't see much room for an actual conversation in your choice of words.