3 ms·
your sentiment is directionally correct but the details are more complicated... a lender’s job is to price default risk. if they could do this properly (pricin
by clairity 8y ago
your sentiment is directionally correct but the details are more complicated...
a lender’s job is to price default risk. if they could do this properly (pricing at a premium), they’d prefer higher risk because it would net them more profits (this is supposed to be reigned in by regulations on risk exposure but we saw how effective that was a decade ago). so higher risk does generally benefit the lender.
however, lenders are horrible at being real estate investors and property owners/managers, so they’d rather avoid (most) foreclosures as it’s less profitable to them. they’ve even gotten out of managing the loans in many cases, preferring to sell them off and reinvesting the money in new loans instead. it’s specialization at work.
- pertymcpert 8y agoDoes any of this matter? Higher default risk means the rate of defaults is higher, so the costs of foreclosure and repossession will be higher. If the market is competitive, they should be making the same amount of money on average as low risk. Low risk by definition is going to have lower repossession costs. This changes when banks exploit mispricing or miscalculation of risk by other lenders, to undercut them or to buy low risk debt at high risk prices.