3 ms·
Ah but now we are talking about opinions and assumptions. You wrote that the linked talk will answer or obviate my questions, which it didn't. It made some fair
by short_sells_poo 8y ago
Ah but now we are talking about opinions and assumptions. You wrote that the linked talk will answer or obviate my questions, which it didn't. It made some fairly wild predictions with little actual evidence. The predictions are interesting for sure, but I like to see more robust support for such ambitious claims.
- crusso 8y agoYou're just being argumentative. There's nothing you can predict that isn't built upon some assumptions. "When I flip this light switch, the lights will go on like they have the last 10,000 times I did so." Is a prediction built upon assumptions that power is still running, that the light bulb hasn't burnt out, and that physics will continue working the way it has up to this point. You need to consider the strength of the assumptions in order to evaluate the predictions. If you consider those assumptions to not be fairly solid... whatever. But just handwaving that because "we are talking about opinions and assumptions" somehow gives your disbelief credibility worth exploring is a non-starter.