3 ms·
Well, as the linked post says in the first paragraph, almost 90% of the 554 new characters aren’t emoji, and include four new scripts (used by several different
by thomasfoster96 8y ago
Well, as the linked post says in the first paragraph, almost 90% of the 554 new characters aren’t emoji, and include four new scripts (used by several different languages) and additions for several other scripts. Emoji are only mentioned once in the first half of the article, and unless you consider accessibility-related emoji to be only for a “fringe diversity group”, I’m not sure how the newly added emoji [0] could be particularly controversial?
[0] http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-released.html http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-released.html
- Cthulhu_ 8y agoAnd only 14 of the new emoji are related to accessibility, of which 6 are gender-specific. The rest is stuff like garlic and yo-yo. I mean think of yo-yoers what you will but I don't think they're a fringe diversity group :p.