4 ms·
Is it actually OK to publish subscriber links here? The content is interesting though. > Be aware that printk output is no longer time-sorted. So does dmesg s
by d33 8y ago
Is it actually OK to publish subscriber links here? The content is interesting though.
> Be aware that printk output is no longer time-sorted.
So does dmesg sort it?
- saagarjha 8y agoI think LWN is fine with it, at least based on https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn#slinks https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn#slinks: > Where is it appropriate to post a subscriber link? > Almost anywhere. Private mail, messages to project mailing lists, and blog entries are all appropriate. As long as people do not use subscriber links as a way to defeat our attempts to gain subscribers, we are happy to see them shared.
- shakna 8y ago> Be aware that printk output is no longer time-sorted. Actually, it never was, but now you see the real timestamps. This seems strange at first. [0] It seems behaviour relying on printk to be time-sorted was relying on behaviour that wasn't actually the case. It's just being spelled out in this patch-set. [0] https://lwn.net/ml/linux-kernel/20190212143003.48446-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de/ https://lwn.net/ml/linux-kernel/20190212143003.48446-1-john....