4 ms·
It seems like a bad argument to me. Companies have multiple revenue streams for things all the time. "double charging" is a slogan, not an argument.
by aero142 8y ago
It seems like a bad argument to me. Companies have multiple revenue streams for things all the time. "double charging" is a slogan, not an argument.
- int_19h 8y agoIt's a counterpoint to "charging these two companies ... for the amount of network buildout that's required to support their increasing demands" - given that said traffic is produced by ISP customers who have already paid for their respective Internet connections, it's clear that this is not what they're charging for.