Here's the original "study" (2018) which is really just a marketing piece: https://desktime.com/blog/17-52-ratio-most-productive-people https://desktime.com/blo

Here's the original "study" (2018) which is really just a marketing piece: https://desktime.com/blog/17-52-ratio-most-productive-people https://desktime.com/blog/17-52-ratio-most-productive-people No mention of the sample size, the work being measured, or the methodology in general. I'm not at all surprised that this garbage got picked up by Quartz, but it doesn't belong on HN.