I'd be more comfortable if it said "Monism Could Save the Soul of Physics". Writing "Quantum Monism" makes too many assumptions about where the Monism is. What

I'd be more comfortable if it said "Monism Could Save the Soul of Physics". Writing "Quantum Monism" makes too many assumptions about where the Monism is. What if the Monism is a layer down from the quantum layer? Or 10 layers down? Or a million? It's also possible that "down" is the wrong word. Or perhaps there are constituent parts to the Monism. Indeed, what is really meant? If the monads are like Church functions in the Lambda calculus, and if they therefore struggle with the problem of incomparability, and they are linked to some comparison function, it is possible they trace an ellipsis in a space created by their interaction of their comparability. So then it would be more like, "steps going around", rather than "layers down".