This is an excellent link, but hardly a proof. First, it does not preclude a computer from somehow obtaining a soul. Second, the reason to reject its conclusion

This is an excellent link, but hardly a proof. First, it does not preclude a computer from somehow obtaining a soul. Second, the reason to reject its conclusion (that computers have no souls) is, literally: > However, this conclusion should be rejected as being absurd on its face. Which is not saying much. I still recommend to read the whole thing, but the general outcome is based on not much apart from a personal notion of absurdity.