6 ms·
NetBSD is 100% reproducible. https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_fully_reproducible_builds https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_fully_reproducible_...
by rvp-x 8y ago
NetBSD is 100% reproducible. https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_fully_reproducible_builds https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_fully_reproducible_... https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/netbsd/netbsd.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/netbsd/netbsd.html
- diffeomorphism 8y agoTo be fair: > 56 (100.0%) out of 56 built NetBSD files were reproducible That is not really comparable to debian's 26475/28522 for buster https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.ht...
- Foxboron 8y agoBut is it "reproducible" or reproducible? Holger still considers the debian numbers "reproducible" as we are only building things twice. To achieve proper reproducible builds the artifacts needs to be reproducible by users. User facing tools needs to be provided and I have yet to see how NetBSD provides this.
- lixtra 8y agoAs far as I understand your pages that applies only to the kernel, not the whole distribution. The Linux kernel is reproducible as well: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.ht...