3 ms·
That's just... completely untrue, and is definitely sexist. By the way, that De Beers campaign was marketed at the men, not the women, so it's men that are fal
by diminoten 8y ago
That's just... completely untrue, and is definitely sexist.
By the way, that De Beers campaign was marketed at the men, not the women, so it's men that are falling for that rule just as much, if not more, than women are demanding it.
Putting the cost of weddings at the feet of the brides is ridiculous.
For reference, I'm getting married in April, and it's been my wonderful bride who has kept costs way down, compared to my wild spending ideas.
- monocasa 8y agoIt was marketed towards both. Men to go out and buy the rings, women not to accept rings 'beneath them'. Advertising is absolutely just straight up sexist in a lot of cases, and people (speaking in the broad strokes that you have to when talking about complete populations) eat that up. I definitely know someone who got turned down because the ring he bought her wasn't expensive enough. Personally I think he dodged a bullet, but that's neither here nor there there. Advertisers use sexist advertising because it works. https://youtu.be/85HT4Om6JT4 https://youtu.be/85HT4Om6JT4