Just in case you are not already bored thinking about the design of this ;) My header and font size remarks would result in something like this: https://screens

Just in case you are not already bored thinking about the design of this ;) My header and font size remarks would result in something like this: https://screenshots.firefox.com/UbXL8WRNN95pfYRm/git.sr.ht https://screenshots.firefox.com/UbXL8WRNN95pfYRm/git.sr.ht (strangely, the shadow looks better in the browser). That's of course not completely done nor a fix-all. There might be an alignment issue with the navbar entries and the sourcehut logo? It also made me think about the file header (git.sr.ht/gitsrht/service.py -rw-r--r-- 3.0 KiB View raw), that one needs a bit of structure, and that darker grey next to the different line number grey looks strange. body font size removed, but I kept making the code font size smaller (code normally is smaller still) and reduced the line height there to 1.2. h2 font size reduced as well, but whether that's the right size depends on the ratio chosen for the other hs. One remark more: > > Imho the summary tab should show the files in the repo, as Github does > I disagree here as well, just as a matter of taste. This shouldn't be a matter of taste. It's a matter of what helps users gets the job done better. It's a question to observe during a user test.